Fire Fifty

Lies of Aug 17, Wyffels Hybrids Production Facility, Atkinson, Illinois.  Lies told, exposed and repeated anyway are omitted.

You know, this downgrade that happened, they didn’t downgrade us because America couldn’t pay its bills. They downgraded it because they felt that our political system couldn’t seem to make good decisions in order to deal with our budget the same way families deal with their budgets.

This is a lie. They downgraded us because of this.  That is the your work, Mr. Obama, along with Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Waxman, Wrangel, and the rest of Insane Clown Posse.

Continue reading →

Making wishes come true

Allan Lichtman, the American University professor whose election formula has correctly called every president since Ronald Reagan’s 1984 re-election, has a belated birthday present for Barack Obama: Rest easy, your re-election is in the bag….Lichtman developed his 13 Keys in 1981. They test the performance of the party that holds the presidency. If six or more of the 13 keys go against the party in power, then the opposing party wins.

I can’t help but think Mr. Lichtman is shading his assessment in order to build the expectation that Obama will win. His analysis has Obama holding 9 keys. 4 of those are either too soon to say or wishcasting, leaving Obama 5 keys. “The keys have figured into popular politics a bit,” Lichtman says. “They’ve never missed. They’ve been right seven elections in a row. A number that goes way beyond statistical significance in a record no other system even comes close to.”

Obama is going to lose. Mr Lichtmann the academic would tell you so . Mr Lichtmann the political hack is pissing on your leg and tellng you it’s raining.

Continue reading →

(INTERIOR, Mr. CAIN head and shoulders, appears to be seated at desk, actually standing at lectern) MR. CAIN: Good evening I’m Herman Cain. I recently used the shorthand phrase “brainwashed” in discussing black American voting patterns. Let me expand. I’ll do that by giving a pretend speech to the NAACP. Continue reading →

Secretary of State: John Bolton
Secretary of Defense: David Petraeus
Secretary of the Treasury: Rick Santelli
Secretary of Homeland Security: Cofer Black
Director Office Management Budget: Dave Ramsey
Attorney General: Ken Cuccinelli
Secretary of the Interior: Sarah Palin
Secretary of Health and Human Services: Mickey Kaus
Secretary of Agriculture: Lee Stranahan, winding down
Secretary of Commerce: Bank Of America CEO, winding down
Secretary of Labor: Boeing CEO, winding down
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development: Donald Trump, winding down
Secretary of Energy: Sarah Palin, winding down
Secretary of Education: Michelle Rhee, winding down
Secretary of Veterans Affairs: Jim Webb, winding down
Administrator of the EPA: Hugh Hewitt, winding down
Office of the Trade Representative: Ron Paul, winding down (quit manipulating your currencies and get off my lawn)
Chief of Staff: I know there was some guy who thought he’d make a great chief of staff, but we do have this turnip…
Ambassador to the UN: No one ever did it better than Jeane Kirkpatrick, so let’s prop her ashes in the chair and let the maniacs holler at her. I think Jeane would approve and it would definitely raise the room IQ.

other notable possibilities

SCOTUS: Thomas Sowell, VDH
NLRB: CEO of Gibson Guitars, CEO of Whole Foods
Press Secretary: Pinko Jeopardy – Newt, Glen, Andrew, loser becomes Press Secretary.
EEOC – Linda Chavez, Ward Connerly, a middle-aged white guy, a teenage girl of Asian ancestry who watches less than 2 hours of TV a week

comrade Ayers,

As your compatriots say, I love it when a plan comes together. 50 years of dedicated work, along dark, seemingly obscure paths, superficially un-related to our long term objectives, toiling quietly, putting on the clown mask occasionally, the Mona Lisa smile mostly, and the bare teeth oh ever so rarely. You, who, let’s face it, are a man of tremendous ego (and what historical shaper of mankind is not?) managed to develop the self-discipline, the inner acceptance, the wa, necessary to “lead from behind”, and it worked! They voted for you! You know it, we know it, he knows it. Dreams are your Dreams, they fell in love with you, your writing, your words, your Ayers Thought! And if there were any justice in this world, everyone would know that.

Well, there may be no justice now, but soon, comrade, soon.

I know you are very busy with the Endgame, but our experience is that this is the time to really start preparing for the After. You may be thinking, we have not broken through our core 15 – 20% support levels, and that support is based on the “lying socialist” community organizer paradigm. Once we strip away the mask, that core support will drop to 10% max. Remember, comrade: Will. Will to victory. Will to use violence. Will is the great force multiplier. You are fighting to destroy, they are fighting to uphold a fragile structure. 10% is plenty.

Anyway, back to preliminary thoughts on the After. There are two schools on this, our original model, massive violence against the group most likely to use the same tactics as you (the Left-SRs for us). We did have to “put down” quite a bit of talent, but Vladimir Ilyich knew long before old Uncle Joe all about omelettes & eggs. Anyway, that model doesn’t really apply to you, the folks nearest to you in ideology have no balls and will sing your praises on the way into the camps. No, your problem is those damn armed Constitutionalists. Very tricky. You just can’t let yourself get caught in a direct action confrontation with them until you’ve had a chance to disarm them. Fast and Furious did not work very well, eh? What did we tell you about believing your own bullshit, you can’t let affirmative action put incompetents in these critical positions. You have no choice but to continue with our Thousand Cuts approach. Maybe your Left Coast comrades can blaze a trail, stop open carry, require registration of long guns? Oh wait, I see we’ve got that just this week. You kids!

Anyway, start to think about the After. Your enemies aren’t going to put themselves up against the wall, are they?

Fraternally yours,

P

P.S. this little “c” comrade crap is kinda gay. I may have to take my shirt off and karate a tiger.

P.P.S. Humor impaired?

Let’s you and I play a game. Whoever wins will dramatically influence the course of American life over the next 30 – 50 years.  I’ll set the bounds of the game, I’ll referee, and I’ll report the game.  Go.

I understand people occasionally wager on the outcome of games. Which side would you bet on in this game? Would you be willing to bet your children and grand-children’s prosperity and freedom on the rube position in this game? Is there any reason you would voluntarily put yourself in the rube position?
CNN
Anderson Cooper
Karen Tumulty
Politico
Google
Charlie Rose
What, Sid Blumenthal was unavailable? Why don’t you just let Plouffe and Axelrod moderate? Maybe you could hose down someone from the Occupation to finger twinkle us what we should be discussing next?

It is important to understand that it is not just bias in the actual questions, or the Chris Wallace DC-gotcha bullshit, the Anderson Cooper religious tittie-twisting to provoke bickering that hurts us. What is really hurting us is allowing our opponents to define the overall limits of appropriate topics, the focus of our energy, the relative importance of our many problems. Is Anderson Cooper going to ask any of the candidates how our children are going to survive 25 years from now when these damn bills come due? Think Charlie Rose is going to ask about how to recover from the loss of American prestige overseas because of Obama? Sure, Tumulty will ask about Obama’s Jobs Bill, Jobs Bill, Jobs bill, when every conservative knows there is no Jobs bill, there is a tax bill spliced into Son of Stimulus, and that is damn annoying, but it is the control of our overall discourse willingly given by our candidates to their opponents that is really pissing me off.

For the love of God man stop letting the MBM moderate our debates! I don’t mean to imply that you and your media consultants have your heads up your asses, but really, take a deep breath, take a step back and look at what you are doing.  Please don’t tell me that I have to explain to you that there is no line between the Democrat party and the media, they are your opponent, they are all  in and of the Left and they despise what you stand for. They may like you personally, they may be warm human beings, but they are not operating by the traditional American idea of political fair play and they want to take you down.

I am not advocating you run from the press. There is plenty of time for them, but we also need a debate where conservatives ask questions that we would like to actually have answered. They are not designed to make you look bad, start a bitch-slapping session, limit the debate to Democrat approved areas of discussion, or make some pinko talking head look good at his next West-Ho GaGaPalooza. They would be designed to see who understands what is wrong now, what needs to be done, and how to do it.

2012 can be about mountains of debt left to our children, the corrosive effects of the entitlement society, and a bold vision for reducing massively over-grown government, removing the throttle on prosperity for all. But not if the questions are about Republicans blocking Obama’s Jobs bill and how funky those Mormons are.

I don’t often read all of a NY Times story, for the same reasons I don’t wander around asking people to hit me with a baseball bat. And while the story is somewhat interesting, the language, focus, and mindset of the reporter John Broder, the editors, and the organization that produced are much more interesting. The primary source is Lisa P. Jackson, EPA Administrator, Defender of The Children, battling Bill Daley and Cass Sunstein, Stalking Horses for the League of Darkness, over a new ozone rule.

Continue reading →

How many lies can you fit into a single NY Times lead sentence?.

Europe’s leaders braced their nations for a turbulent year, with their beleaguered economies facing a threat on two fronts: widening deficits that force more borrowing but increasing austerity measures that put growth further out of reach.

Note the martial language, economies are beleaguered, they are facing a threat. Threats. The problem is that deficits are widening you see. That’s like a natural disaster or something, there’s really nothing people can do about it. It just is. And that is what causes increased borrowing. It’s like physics or math. It’s certainly not Obama’s anyone’s fault. Well, there was all that defense spending right? If anything that’s it.

Increasing austerity measures. Austerity. It really is the only approved word in discussing issues like this. Reminds one of a monocled 1%er so prim and proper one couldn’t pound a nail up his ass with a sledgehammer, eh? Increasing austerity measures. Now some might say postponing the European Union GLBT Green Summer Playhouse for Social Justice is too drastic of an austerity measure, as opposed to something really dramatic, like keeping overall spending flat or something even more draconian, spending fewer actual Euros next year than this.  Pish tosh, can’t be balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.

And of course, the punch line, the whole point of the lie sentence, is to say increasing austerity measures that put growth further out of reach. There we go. Growth is out of reach BECAUSE of austerity measures. Not running deficits every year forever, in the past and into the future. Not because the Greeks are lazy tax-cheats that make Chicago public employee union members look like a team of eager beavers. Nope, it is “austerity measures”. We’ve identified the cause of the problem, and of course we all know without even saying which yahoos are always pushing “austerity”.

Shorter Times: The TEA Party is killing the European economy too.

I have been off for a while, lost and confused and exactly where the TOJAP(1) wants me. We’re losing in a slow motion train wreck, I can see it happening right before my eyes, and I can’t seem to do anything to stop it. I find myself in grudging admiration of Team Prog, fifty years of planning and working and dreaming and lying and organizing and taking tiny incremental steps, advancing on all fronts, always pushing, always pressing, working mostly within the system but lying about their intentions, using our freedoms and our strengths against us in ways that would make Uncle Ho weep in admiration. And our side? Pick a random  post from this blog over the past few months. less depressing stuff